How REG Network Helps
Fix Centralised Compliance Data Gaps

Stop maintaining AML screening across spreadsheets, inboxes and separate systems. REG Network gives every counterparty’s screening status a single, always up to date home.

Book a solutions call

Most compliance teams start out with AML screening that works well enough. Sanctions, PEP and adverse media checks get run, results get filed, and re-checks happen when someone remembers to schedule them. The trouble starts as the counterparty network grows. Screening gets run in different tools by different teams, results end up duplicated or missing, and no one can say with full confidence whether every active counterparty has actually been screened to the same standard.

At that point, answering a simple question, “have we screened this broker, and when,” can mean digging through old emails, spreadsheets and individual case files. That’s manageable with a handful of counterparties. It isn’t manageable at hundreds or thousands, and it’s exactly the kind of gap that surfaces at the worst possible time, during an audit or a regulatory request.

REG Network centralises AML screening results, history and re-checks in a single workflow. Instead of screening status living in whoever last ran the check, it lives in the counterparty record itself, visible to anyone who needs it, automatically kept current as new checks run.

Why Fragmented AML Screening Creates Risk

Fragmented screening data rarely causes an obvious failure on its own. It causes a slow loss of confidence in compliance decisions that were made on data nobody can fully account for.

Many firms still end up with:

Spreadsheet-based screening logs
Screening run in different tools by different teams
Re-checks scheduled manually, if at all
Results stored in individual emails or case files
No single owner of screening status across the network
Screening depth that varies depending on who ran the check

This tends to hold up fine while the network is small. It becomes a genuine governance problem once screening volume outgrows what any one person can track by memory.

The result is usually a combination of:

Counterparties going unscreened or under-screened for longer than anyone realises
Re-checks missed or run late
Audit evidence that has to be reconstructed rather than retrieved
Inconsistent risk decisions depending on who handled the screening
No confident answer to “who have we actually screened, and when”
Sanctions or PEP exposure that goes undetected for longer than it should

For compliance teams, the real issue isn’t the volume of screening being done. It’s the lack of one consistent record that everyone trusts and works from.

Why AML Screening Stops Scaling Across Insurance, MGA and Broker Teams

Screening data fragments gradually rather than all at once. A process that worked fine for a small network breaks down in the same handful of places as it grows.

Screening Spread Across Systems

Underwriting, compliance and operations teams often run screening in different tools, with no shared record of what’s already been checked.

Manual Re-Screening Schedules

Without an automated trigger, re-checks depend on someone remembering to run them, which works until it doesn’t.

No Single Source of Truth

When screening results live in inboxes and individual files, there’s no one place to confirm a counterparty’s current status.

Inconsistent Screening Depth

Without a standard process, the thoroughness of a screening check can vary significantly depending on who carried it out.

Audit Evidence Reconstruction

When a regulator or auditor asks for screening history, teams end up rebuilding it from scratch rather than retrieving it.

Screening That Doesn’t Scale

What works for fifty counterparties breaks down at five hundred. Growing networks expose every gap in a manual screening process.

Centralised AML Screening Records
REG Network keeps sanctions, PEP and adverse media screening results in one place for every counterparty.

Organisations can:
- View current screening status for any counterparty instantly
- See full screening history, not just the most recent result
- Track which checks were run, when, and by whom
- Avoid duplicating screening that’s already been completed
- Apply a consistent screening standard across every team
This removes the guesswork around whether a counterparty has actually been screened, and to what standard.
Automated Re-Screening and Alerts
Manual re-screening schedules are one of the most common ways screening gaps appear. REG Network automates this by continuously monitoring for:
- Sanctions list changes
- New PEP designations
- Adverse media developments
- Other risk-relevant changes to a counterparty’s profile
Alerts are generated automatically when something changes, rather than waiting for a scheduled review that may or may not happen on time.
Consistent, Auditable Screening Standards

Centralised data only solves part of the problem if every team is still screening differently. REG Network applies the same screening process across every counterparty, with a full audit trail of what was checked and when.

Once screening is centralised, Continuous Monitoring keeps it current automatically, so oversight doesn’t depend on anyone remembering to look again.

Find out more about REG Network

Key Platform Capabilities

Sanctions, PEP and Adverse Media Screening

Run consistent AML screening across every counterparty from a single platform.

Centralised Screening History

Trigger re-checks automatically as sanctions lists, PEP designations and adverse media change.

Risk-Based Screening Depth

Apply consistent, defensible screening standards regardless of which team is onboarding a counterparty.

Audit-Ready Screening Records

Evidence every screening decision with a complete, retrievable record rather than rebuilding it after the fact.

Learn more about Automated Compliance Monitoring and Real-Time Regulatory Monitoring.

Screening You Can Actually Account For

Every screening result, re-check and status change is recorded against the counterparty, so the full history is always retrievable.
Fewer Missed Re-Checks

Automated monitoring removes the dependency on someone remembering to schedule a re-screen.

REG Network runs more than 3 million screening and data checks every week across its network, work that would be unmanageable to replicate manually at the same scale.
Consistent Screening Standards

Centralising screening means every counterparty is checked to the same standard, regardless of which team or individual handled it.
Faster Answers to Compliance Questions

Status, history and audit trail are available instantly, rather than requiring a manual search across systems.
Stronger Audit Readiness

Centralised, timestamped records mean screening decisions are ready to evidence without reconstruction.

Real-World Examples from Insurance Organisations

REG Network helps insurers, MGAs and brokers move from periodic reviews to continuous, real-time visibility across their counterparty networks.

Arc Legal Group

Insurance Carrier

Arc Legal Group uses REG Network to centralise due diligence and compliance processes, strengthening audit readiness across its counterparty network.

View case study →

Collingwood Insurance

Insurance Carrier

Collingwood automated broker monitoring and streamlined counterparty management, replacing fragmented manual screening with a centralised process.

View case study →

Generis Underwriting

MGA

Generis Underwriting used REG Network to improve broker monitoring and keep screening consistent as its network grew.

View case study →

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does AML screening become harder to maintain as a network grows?

Screening usually starts out manageable, but as volume increases it tends to spread across different tools and teams, re-checks get missed, and there’s no single record confirming what’s been screened and to what standard.

How does REG Network keep screening data centralised?

REG Network stores sanctions, PEP and adverse media screening results against each counterparty’s record, with full history, so status is always current and visible in one place rather than scattered across systems.

Does REG Network automate re-screening?

Yes. REG Network continuously monitors for sanctions list changes, new PEP designations and adverse media developments, generating alerts automatically rather than relying on manually scheduled reviews.

Can REG Network show a full screening history for audit purposes?

Yes. Every screening result and re-check is timestamped and retrievable, so audit evidence doesn’t need to be reconstructed manually.

Does centralising screening replace compliance judgement?

No. REG Network centralises and automates the screening and monitoring work. Compliance teams remain responsible for reviewing results and making final risk decisions.

Keep AML Screening Consistent as You Grow

REG Network replaces fragmented, manually maintained AML screening with one centralised, continuously updated record for every counterparty. Whether the gap is missed re-checks, inconsistent screening depth or audit evidence that’s hard to produce, REG Network gives compliance teams a single source of truth that scales with the network.

Book a Solutions Call

How REG Network Helps
Fix Centralised Compliance Data Gaps

Why Fragmented AML Screening Creates Risk